tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7002745.post5772951435488314091..comments2023-06-08T11:21:10.878-04:00Comments on EPISTLES FROM THE SCRIPTORIUM: MOTU MANIA - FEEL IT!Brian Michael Pagehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09836644567939527991noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7002745.post-34518013685243548962007-06-15T09:17:00.000-04:002007-06-15T09:17:00.000-04:00Yeah, I was kinda going for borderline sarcasm whe...Yeah, I was kinda going for borderline sarcasm when I wrote "Rite I" and "Rite II". Maybe for us Catlicks we could say "Rite A" and "Rite B". Nah.<BR/><BR/>I for one would LOVE a better quality Novus Ordo. I don't mind keeping current when done right. Scrap the "sacro-pop" crap and you've won at least half the battle. Save the informal (low church) stuff for those tent revivalists. :)<BR/><BR/>BMPBrian Michael Pagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09836644567939527991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7002745.post-64061114099843277342007-06-15T08:47:00.000-04:002007-06-15T08:47:00.000-04:00"Rite I" or "Rite II?" Yikes! "Episcopalian" lan..."Rite I" or "Rite II?" Yikes! "Episcopalian" language like that evokes the feelings of standing on the edge of a high cliff - and slipping. Thank the Lord we're a more solid body of believers than PECUSA/TEC/CoGLTBBQ, currently tearing itself at the seams.<BR/><BR/>I can't wait for a more widely used '62 liturgy, or even a better-quality N.O., but I doubt we as a body of believers will undergo the foundation-breaking turmoil some are predicting. Done well, variety of this sort can only be a good thing.<BR/><BR/>IMHO, to quote my Lutheran friends, "'High Church' is my church, but 'Low Church' is no church!"Paul Stokellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17657177801288943821noreply@blogger.com